2016
Religion aside, this girl is very intelligent. The inteviewer however is a stupid person.
Shaheer :Marcel lee there are two kinds of truth one which is certain and other which is subjective and varies from person to person .. i think the girl understood what you meant but you did’nt understand what the girl just said
socksumi :
A postmodernist Christian. What a combination.
God daaaaamn!!!!!!!!!!!! This bitch is the most bat shit stupid person I’ve ever heard of. And that is quite the accomplishment. I spend quite a lot of time on the internet, so I witness a fuck ton of human stupidity on regular basis. But man…… god damn…. she takes the cake by far.
2:48 flat earth then and now
4:58 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
She’s stroking a beard that’s not there, this how you know she mad af.
She gives hope that the dumb down of our youth has a long way to go, sorry Marcell but her cognitive and articulation skills are spot on and way beyond you!
So if someone doesn’t believe that people drown in water will they drown if they jump in the ocean miles from shore?
This woman is actually intellectually correct about sound. Sound is the translation of vibrations and sound waves by a “hearing apparatus.” Without a hearing apparatus such as our ear contents, there would only be the vibrations or soundwaves, but no perceived or translated sound; Unless you define sound as sound waves and vibrations, as in physics. So like she said, it depends on the relative definition of sound that you are using: In physics sound is simply measurable waves/vibrations, solely. In human/animal physiology and psychology, sound waves must be interpreted by a functioning hearing apparatus in order for the perception of sound to exist. Even then it’s still relative to the animal. For instance, humans can only percieve a certain range of sound waves as sound, while dogs can hear a wider range. The vibrations are still there when a human can’t hear them, but a dog can. For the human there is no sound. But for the dog there is. So, again the answer depends on whether you consider sound to be actually perceived or simply measurable vibrations and sound waves. Thus, both answers could be deemed correct, depending on your definition of sound, just like she said… and this is science for you… in this example, there is no objective truth, just perspective and perception, just like she said.
Miss K :
This is painful. She is so deluded. If s tree falls in the forest, of course it makes a sound. Sound occurs independent of a whether or not there is a being to hear it. The ocean is there whether I have personally seen it or not. There are absolute truths no matter what our perceptions are.
You can believe anything you want, but that does not mean it is true.
So painful. She probably thinks she is really “deep” too 🙄☺
She didn’t want to answer at the end because she realized how stupid she sounded and didn’t want to admit how wrong she was.
Jim :
it is so sad that people do not understand the difference between absolute truth and OPINIONS, yes you can have different opinions but cannot have different truths. Like “Hey I think oxygen is not needed for survival so this is my truth” like ” Hey I think gravity is not true so I am just gonna jump off the building” why is this even a debate?
This interview is getting dumber and dumber by the moment.