2019
I really like the interviews you’ve done regarding religion. I am surprised you are a Trump defender. How disappointing. You’ve never seen evidence that Trump is racist? Yikes
1:05 No one gives you evidence that he’s racist? The recent drama between him and the squad seems pretty obvious to me. He has issues with many other people but he never speaks of or to them as if they’re not American. That is reserved for people who aren’t white. His entire thing with Obama’s nationality is because Obama’s black. He didn’t harass other presidential candidates about their nationality,. In his eyes, American is synonymous with white. And this is all excluding his statements towards average immigrants. I’m calling bullshit on that Marcel.
Regarding the comments at the end: You’re confusing objectivity with neutrality and the difference is very important. Not liking anything about someone or something doesn’t mean you’re not being objective. It tends to mean the exact opposite actually. His statement is right, that he likes that Trump gave a wake up call to look at how the country is run. That’s an objective fact because there was a huge spike in talks about whether or not the counsel(I can’t remember hat it’s called) should be how a president gets elected. He’s being more objective because he’s looking at the facts and laying them out as is. You, on the other hand, are forcing yourself to look at the other side and find some way to appease them, regardless of what the data says. Why should he neutral? He clearly doesn’t like Trump. There’s nothing that makes him illogical there. To be honest, it makes you the more illogical one. And his statement isn’t sarcasm. You may have been looking for another word because sarcasm isn’t it. He genuinely explained his view, showing that’s he’s not making some snarky remark.
He has been taught to believe that Trump is bad….
DREY4400 :
Wow, just wow…